|
By John Jabagchourian
Editor
New
York Life Insurance Co. agreed to pay $10 million to settle a lawsuit over
unpaid policies made by heirs of Armenians killed in the Genocide 86 years ago.
The company, which had a European office
in the early 20th century, sold about 3,300 life insurance policies to Armenians
in the Ottoman Empire prior to 1915. Archives show that about 2,200 of those
policies have not been paid.
These policies, which will be paid at
ten times the face value, are estimated to total at least $7 million. The
company will also give $3 million to Armenian civic organizations.
As part of the settlement announced on
April 11, New York Life will publish a list of names of the families who
purchased life insurance during that time. The list is expected to be published
in a national advertising program towards the end of the year with instructions
for potential beneficiaries.
"We think this is a very fair and
equitable solution to a long-standing issue rooted in a terrible incident that
occurred in the Ottoman Empire," New York Life vice-president, Bill
Werfelman said.
The suit was filed in Los Angeles by
Martin Marootian who contended that he was the beneficiary of one of the
policies. A suit of this type was made possible after a 2000 bill signed into
law by Governor Grey Davis made it possible for Armenian-American California
residents to sue insurance companies over unpaid policies in California courts.
New York Life initially argued that
European courts should preside over such issue. California however, contains the
largest population of Armenians outside of Armenia, and such a case would
attract more attention in the United States.
"I think I can speak for the
clients and say it was important that New York Life recognize the existence of
these claims that were not paid," lead attorney for the plaintiffs Brian
Kabateck, who is half-Armenian, said.
New York Life does not refer to the
"Armenian Genocide" in their statement about the agreement, referring
instead to "widespread deaths" and "massacre." Kabateck said
that he would insist that a final settlement use that term.
A federal judge must still approve of the settlement and
its execution. The decision is expected in a few weeks.
|